Search found 11 matches
- Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:20 pm
- Forum: Suggestions And Bug Reports
- Topic: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3534
Re: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator
Ok. We hope that you will find the solution to this problem.
- Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:11 pm
- Forum: Suggestions And Bug Reports
- Topic: More examples
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2597
Re: More examples
This is good news. Thank you!
- Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:01 pm
- Forum: Suggestions And Bug Reports
- Topic: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3534
Re: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator
It's a pity! This is my second disappointment after an absence of normal reference with examples.
- Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:54 pm
- Forum: General Programming
- Topic: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
- Replies: 28
- Views: 54593
Re: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
You are nothing for me new not opened.Shrek wrote: No because AMS runtme does not recognize anything but .ccd and if you modify .ccd you must modify .exe as both are paired.
Use, if you like.Shrek wrote:This is a good tool.
- Fri Sep 13, 2013 3:03 pm
- Forum: General Programming
- Topic: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
- Replies: 28
- Views: 54593
Re: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
I just wanted to show that your software does not obfuscating and there is no advantage in using it. IMHO. People have been wanting to get rid of the ccd extension for the longest time and this does do that. In this case there is a simple renaming of the .CDD extension in .DLL? No converting happen...
- Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:35 pm
- Forum: General Programming
- Topic: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
- Replies: 28
- Views: 54593
Re: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
You did not understand me . I'm not interested in the source code of someone else's project. I'm just saying that this utility is useless to protect your project.
- Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:03 pm
- Forum: General Programming
- Topic: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
- Replies: 28
- Views: 54593
Re: Bunny Hop CDD obscurer
I just wanted to show that your software does not obfuscating and there is no advantage in using it. IMHO.
- Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:46 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Replacing MemoryEx plug built-in functions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6202
Re: Replacing MemoryEx plug built-in functions
All right. And you can code ? And then I can not understand some action due to the lack of examples for them.
- Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:24 pm
- Forum: Suggestions And Bug Reports
- Topic: [BUG] - Does not run as administrator
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3534
- Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:22 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Replacing MemoryEx plug built-in functions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6202
Replacing MemoryEx plug built-in functions
Is it possible to replace this function: __PtrToArray = function (pBuf) local tRet = {}; local nOffset = 0; local nLen, pData, hData while true do nLen = tonumber(DLL.CallFunction("kernel32.dll", "lstrlenA", pBuf + nOffset, DLL_RETURN_TYPE_INTEGER, DLL_CALL_STDCALL)); if (nLen == 0) then break; end ...